Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh - Starting Rs.0.00 | Zumosun
ISO 9001:2015 Certified
4.8/5 Google Rating

Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh

Reviewed by Zumosun Expert Legal Team
Last Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Get Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh with expert professional assistance and complete compliance support.

Starts at just ₹0 + Govt Fee
Expert assistance and filing in just a few days.
Affordable, transparent pricing with no hidden charges.
Dedicated relationship manager for full compliance support.

Register Your Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company.

Fill details to get a free consultation

🇮🇳 +91
✅ MCA Approved 🔒 100% Secure
★★★★★ 10,000+ Businesses Registered

Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh - Complete Guide

Get your Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. processed in Arunachal Pradesh quickly and efficiently with our expert support team.


Post-Registration Compliance for Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh

Once registration is approved in Arunachal Pradesh, businesses must maintain statutory records and file monthly or annual compliance documents according to legal guidelines.


Why Choose Us for Procedure for removal of Disqualification of Director disqualified u/s 164(2) due to non-filing of Annual return of the Company. in Arunachal Pradesh

Our professional network in Arunachal Pradesh coordinates directly with authorities to offer seamless end-to-end filing at transparent prices.

Additional Details

 

BASIS ON WHICH DIRECTORS CAN BE DISQUALIFIED?

 

Companies Act, 2013 provides disqualification of Director U/s 164(2), a director can be disqualified based on the following reasons

164. (1) A person shall be disqualified from appointment as a director of a company, if
(a) he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(b) he is an undischarged insolvent;
(c) he has applied to be adjudicated as an insolvent and his application is pending;
(d) he has been convicted by a court of any offence, whether involving moral turpitude or otherwise, and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than six months and a period of five years has not elapsed from the date of expiry of the sentence:

Provided that if a person has been convicted of any offence and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for a period of seven years or more, he shall not be eligible to be appointed as a director in any company;

(e) an order disqualifying him for appointment as a director has been passed by a court or Tribunal and the order is in force;
(f) he has not paid any calls in respect of any shares of the company held by him, whether alone or jointly with others, and six months have elapsed from the last day fixed for the payment of the call;
(g) he has been convicted of the offence dealing with related party transactions under section 188 at any time during the last preceding five years; or
(h) he has not complied with subsection (3) of section 152. Allotment of Director identification number.

(I) No person can hold Directorship in more than twenty Companies At a Time (out of them maximum public company directorship can be 10 only)

164(2) No person who is or has been a director of a company which—
(a) has not filed financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of three financial years; or
(b) has failed to repay the deposits accepted by it or pay interest thereon or to redeem any debentures on the due date or pay the interest due thereon or pay any dividend declared and such failure to pay or redeem continues for one year or more,

shall not be eligible to be re-appointed as a director of that company or appointed in other company for a period of five years from the date on which the said company fails to do so.]

MCA has disqualified 5.12 lakh directors so far to become a director in any Company for 5 years under section 164(2) and 167(1)(a) of the Act. 

HOW DISQUALIFICATION UNDER SECTION 164(2) CAN BE REMOVED

Earlier a Condonation of delay scheme was initiated by the Ministry of Corporate affairs where temporary activation of DIN was Initiated through which Company can file his Annual return and pending Document and can make default good.

PROCESS OF REMOVAL OF DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTOR AND STRIKE OFF STATUS OF COMPANY?

An appeal can be made to the High court for removal of Disqualification declared by ROC under section 164(2)

After the expiration of CODS, disqualified directors can appeal to the High Court independently for the DIN revival and National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to restore their Company name.

TO FILE A WRIT PETITION– The first and foremost step that a disqualified director needs to take is to file a Writ petition. The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution before the High Court. An appellant must accompany these set of information in correspondence to the said Writ petition:

  • Memo of parties to the petition comprising the name, designation, address, etc.;
  • A Notice of Motion with an urgent application;
  • Explain the factors which lead to the non-compliance of filing of statutory documents;
  • Also, include a synopsis of the list of date and events;
  • Current status of the company and directors seeking restoration;
  • A list of all the companies in which the appellant is the director;
  • A copy of Press Release or Impugned Notice which the ROC has issued, listing all disqualified directors;
  • Stay application under Section 151 of CPC;
  • And a Prayer clause to discard the publication issued by the ROC under Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013. 

APPEAL UNDER SECTION 252- The next step is to file a petition under Section 252 of the Companies Act. It applies to those companies whose name got struck off in disqualification. Such an appeal is made before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to recover the name of the company with ROC.

FILE STATUTORY DOCUMENTS- After the regulatory bodies of NCLT and Hon’ble High Court passes the orders of DIN reactivation and revival of struck off the company. The appellant requires to file Statutory documents with ROC. Also, file the annual returns of the last three years with Income-Tax Authority.

ACTIVATION OF DIN- Once the appellant meets all the necessary compliances and pays off any imposed penalty, the ROC takes the course of action. Thereby ROC raises a ticket on MCA21 portal via Change Requirement Form (CRF) and uploads a copy of the concerned order on the portal. Thus, after validation of CRF, the deactivated DIN shall get reactivated again.

you can post on zumosun.com or contact 9119112929 for your query. The Legal Bank has the all professional at a single platform including Chartered Accountant, Company Secretary, Lawyer’s, and engineers to provide 360-business solution. We have an average 8 years of business incorporation &legal experience.

 

4.8 ★
Google Reviews
15+ Years
Expert Service
2 Lakh+
Happy Clients
100%
Online Process

Client Testimonials

What Our Clients Say

Don't just take our word for it. Here's what our valued clients have to say about their experience with us.

"

The expertise and dedication shown by the team is unmatched. They helped us scale our operations seamlessly with their top-notch services.

S
Sneha Gupta
Startup Founder
Google Review
"

Outstanding quality and attention to detail. The team was responsive, knowledgeable, and truly cared about our success. Highly recommended!

P
Priya Sharma
Marketing Director
Google Review
"

We are extremely satisfied with their work. Their proactive approach and timely delivery have made a huge difference to our workflow.

V
Vikram Singh
Operations Manager
Google Review

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

WhatsApp Chat Here